Integration and protocol matrix
Available, project-integrated, validation or roadmap status is explicit.
enlogyIntegrate and Deliver
Connect systems through governed interfaces instead of one-off data bridges.
Enlogy integrates its products with documented field, plant, building, enterprise and reporting systems while keeping data ownership, authentication, failure behaviour and support boundaries explicit.
Discuss Your Project
Project risks this service addresses
- Interfaces are built as isolated bridges without ownership or lifecycle documentation.
- Protocol and write-authority assumptions create operational risk.
- Enterprise workflows cannot trust field data quality or failure status.
Engineering scope
- EnergyPortal, enPowerManager, enCoreEnergy and Scadify integration
- SCADA, PLC, RTU, inverter, turbine, meter, BMS, HVAC, lighting, pump and BESS interfaces
- APIs, databases, MQTT, Modbus, IEC 60870-5-104 and OPC UA where documented and qualified
- ERP, CMMS, identity, reporting and workflow interfaces
- Authentication, test data, failure handling and change management
Required inputs and prerequisites
- Interface specifications and system-owner contacts
- Network access, credentials through approved secure channels and test data
- Protocol, tag, API and data-retention requirements
- Acceptance criteria and support responsibilities
Delivery workflow
- Define interface ownership and data contract
- Map source data, commands, identity and network boundaries
- Implement or configure the qualified integration
- Test normal, invalid, delayed and unavailable states
- Document handover, support and change management
Deliverables
Evidence that can be reviewed, tested and handed over.
Interface-control document
Data, authentication, ownership, failure and test boundaries.
sharedIntegration test evidence
Positive, negative, outage, quality and recovery scenarios within scope.
sharedAcceptance and evidence framework
- Every interface has an owner and acceptance method
- Protocols are labelled by release or project status
- Authentication and failure paths are tested
- Support boundaries and changes are documented
Responsibility matrix
Make interfaces explicit before work starts.
| Role | Boundary |
|---|---|
| Enlogy | Responsible for the contracted engineering, software, integration and documentation scope. |
| Customer | Provides site information, decisions, access, operating constraints and acceptance participation. |
| EPC, OEM or installation partner | Participates according to the approved interface and responsibility matrix. |
| Grid operator or authority | Defines applicable requirements and remains responsible for formal approval or acceptance. |
Products used
Relevant solutions
Relevant industries
Customer results
Technical resources
Related services
Continue through the delivery lifecycle.
Questions to resolve first
Does Enlogy support every OEM and protocol?
No. Compatibility is evaluated against the documented integration matrix, release status, project interface and write authority.
Can roadmap protocols be used in production?
Roadmap and validation items are not presented as released production capabilities.
Who owns the source data?
Data ownership, access and retention remain defined by the customer and source-system responsibility matrix.
Scope and publication boundary
Integration capability is described by documented interface scope, not by an unqualified universal protocol claim. Final responsibilities, qualifications, test criteria, support terms and regulatory acceptance remain subject to the project contract and approved documentation.
Next step